Playwright vs Cypress

Playwright vs Cypress

A detailed comparison of two popular end-to-end testing frameworks.

web development | automation | tools

Introduction

End-to-end (E2E) testing is crucial for ensuring web applications work as intended. Two of the most widely used frameworks are Playwright and Cypress. While both aim to simplify automated testing, they differ in architecture, features, and browser support.

Overview

Playwright

Developed by Microsoft, Playwright allows automation across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit with a single API. It supports modern web apps and multiple platforms, including mobile emulation.

Cypress

Cypress is a JavaScript-based E2E testing framework designed for fast, reliable tests in the browser. It features real-time reloads, an interactive test runner, and excellent debugging tools.

Feature Comparison

Feature Playwright Cypress
Browser Support Chromium, Firefox, WebKit Chromium, Firefox (partial), Edge
Language JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C# JavaScript, TypeScript
Parallel Testing Yes, built-in Yes, via Dashboard Service
Mobile Testing Supports mobile emulation Limited
Debugging Tools Inspector, tracing, screenshots, video Interactive Test Runner, screenshots, video
CI/CD Integration Yes, flexible Yes, best with Cypress Dashboard

Conclusion

Both Playwright and Cypress are powerful frameworks for E2E testing. If you need **cross-browser testing, multiple languages, or mobile emulation**, Playwright is the stronger choice. On the other hand, **Cypress shines in developer experience**, with fast feedback loops and an interactive test runner that is great for debugging.